In early high school, my girlfriends began to pair off with upper-class boys, and I was still trying to convince people to spend Friday nights pigging out on fruit-flan at the local grocery store, or to go sledding, or some other slightly immature pastime. It soon became clear that the only kids still interested in such pursuits were the boys on the brain game team, the ones who sat in the corner during gifted and talented classes composing very odd stories about robots and black holes. They did role playing games. They smelled funny. One of them acquired the nickname "Crest" for his apparent lack of knowledge that such a product existed.
On the brain game team, there was a science boy (who's now a surgeon), physics boy (who's a programmer), a keeper of excessive trivia on all subjects but mostly history (a music producer), and I was lit girl. Though I should note--they answered most of the questions.
And yet, they weren't straight A students. They tended to underperform academically, even though they were clearly some of the smartest students in school. The valedictorian and salutatorian positions went to a couple of type A kids who were bright and organized, but not necessarily superior minds.
I'm thinking about those boys a lot lately because one of my own boys got in trouble at school recently for scribing "Death to Kickball" on the blacktop in chalk. All the in-crowd kids play kickball, and my boys really don't. One teacher described my boys and their friends as "the fantasy group," because they're always in la-la land, drawing tiny detailed pictures, talking about alternate universes, and using words that are too big for their bodies.
Last year there was a lot of conversation about popularity, and whether or not my boys desired to be popular. There was a moment when they realized (actually, I had to tell them) that one doesn't exactly choose to be popular, one has to be chosen. And if the crowd does not bestow it's affection on you, the best you can hope for is to steal their attention by acquiring notoriety. Not the same thing. Still, notoriety sometimes comes involuntarily when you're a nose-picker with a high IQ and questionable social skills.
So I tried to boost the perks of not being in the in-crowd. No pressures to be something you're not, freedom to be weird, etc. Plus, all those boys who were geeky in school eventually found ethereal girls from far away to marry, and have done quite well for themselves--either because it was always their destiny to succeed, or they were motivated to do well in order to prove that they never really were the underdogs, despite all appearances to the contrary.
Neither my husband nor I resided exclusively in the in-crowd in grade school, nor were we nerds. A friend once called me a bridge personality. I could go both ways. And that still feels like the most comfortable place for me to be. Not quite here nor there. And I think the same is true for my husband (assuming we still had a social life or crowds with whom to run).
So trying to figure out my kids is a puzzle, and I find myself wishing that I'd paid more attention to the mothers of those boys on the brain game team back when I was wandering around in their houses and eating their (often bran-flaked) food. Having reconnected with some of those boys in adulthood, I know that one of their moms gave up her loose career in leather stamping and mandolin playing to go back to school for a PhD. She's now a professor. One was and is an apparently happy housewife to a dentist. A third was always kind of a shadowy figure, possibly due to antisocial characteristics of her own.
In any case, I want to see that process, of allowing your children to be whoever they're going to be--finding strengths to emphasize, supporting through the failures, and helping the kids to be ok with their placement in the group--wherever that place happens to be. Though I believe that process tends to be a hidden one for mothers everywhere, because it's a very humbling experience to discover all the myriad ways that your children are not you.
2 hours ago

